<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative Commons: A Great Concept I&#8217;ll Continue to Employ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/</link>
	<description>A Photography Resource for the Aspiring Hobbyist</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 16 Month Statistics for Epic Edits</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-69788</link>
		<dc:creator>16 Month Statistics for Epic Edits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-69788</guid>
		<description>[...] Creative Commons: A Great Concept I’ll Continue to Employ 11,631 Views and 44 Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Creative Commons: A Great Concept I’ll Continue to Employ 11,631 Views and 44 Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Auer</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26754</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Auer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26754</guid>
		<description>Hey, wow, that's pretty cool stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, wow, that&#8217;s pretty cool stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Udi</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26717</link>
		<dc:creator>Udi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26717</guid>
		<description>Looks like you are in good company. The nature magazine are CCing now: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v450/n7171/full/450762b.html
- udi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you are in good company. The nature magazine are CCing now: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v450/n7171/full/450762b.html" >http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v450/n7171/full/450762b.html</a><br />
- udi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26614</guid>
		<description>Err that last post should read, 'I'm no lawyer'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err that last post should read, &#8216;I&#8217;m no lawyer&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-26613</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Cool post. The laws and regs around this area are a nightmare and most non lawyers could easily be caught out. However, at least the CC tries to translate this. As for the gray area re: who has to have to have rights to publish, I would have thought the photographer should ensure this is sorted? They create the picture and made it publicly available so I maybe that is where the onus is?

I'm lawyer but just thinking about it. E.G in the UK the person in the photo eseentially owns all the copyright unless they sign a release form because it is their image and they own that.

Could easily be wrong so interested in other UK thoughts on this??

Cool post

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Cool post. The laws and regs around this area are a nightmare and most non lawyers could easily be caught out. However, at least the CC tries to translate this. As for the gray area re: who has to have to have rights to publish, I would have thought the photographer should ensure this is sorted? They create the picture and made it publicly available so I maybe that is where the onus is?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m lawyer but just thinking about it. E.G in the UK the person in the photo eseentially owns all the copyright unless they sign a release form because it is their image and they own that.</p>
<p>Could easily be wrong so interested in other UK thoughts on this??</p>
<p>Cool post</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landscape Photography and Nature Photography by Jim M. Goldstein - JMG-Galleries - Copyright &#38; Creative Commons: The Poll Results</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-24263</link>
		<dc:creator>Landscape Photography and Nature Photography by Jim M. Goldstein - JMG-Galleries - Copyright &#38; Creative Commons: The Poll Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-24263</guid>
		<description>[...] to see how people are operating in relation to Copyright versus Creative Commons. Brian Auer ran a counter point article to my Creative Commons: A Great Concept, I’ll Never Employ article and received 500+ Diggs to my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to see how people are operating in relation to Copyright versus Creative Commons. Brian Auer ran a counter point article to my Creative Commons: A Great Concept, I’ll Never Employ article and received 500+ Diggs to my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Commons or Copyright for Your Photos?</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-21099</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Commons or Copyright for Your Photos?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-21099</guid>
		<description>[...] &#38; Creative Commons: The Poll&#8220;. It&#8217;s a follow-up to the recent posts on the use of Creative Commons, and I ran the same poll as Jim for a week so we could combine our results for a more comprehensive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#38; Creative Commons: The Poll&#8220;. It&#8217;s a follow-up to the recent posts on the use of Creative Commons, and I ran the same poll as Jim for a week so we could combine our results for a more comprehensive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-18372</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-18372</guid>
		<description>@ mr.bad eye

[chop]...
i think the font size used is too small.
it really makes it annoying to read a longer post.
[/chop]...

If you are using a browser other than the now infamous Microsoft Internet Explorer versions 6 and under, you can simply hit 'control' + '+' key. Conversely, font sizes can be shrunk using 'control' + '-' keys. Just be warned that some browsers (like Firefox) will simply boost the font size but retain the other website structure's size and integrity (which is what I personally prefer). Other browsers (like IE 7 or Opera for example) will scale everything (graphics included!).

@ Brian,

Great article. I really enjoyed it. Being paranoid, I simply keep images I shoot (and graphics I create) under complete copyright protection with all rights reserved. And as you mentioned, by posting images that are far less in resolution that their native maximum in-camera size, it makes 'theft for large printing purposes' more limiting. As far as I am concerned, if you don't want people making large prints out of images, don't offer them access to full sized shots posted on the net.

I see many images posted in all their full resolution glory. This is simply an invitation to trouble IMHO. Being responsible on your end to help minimize potential damage is just as important as ensuring your work is properly protected from a legal standpoint.

Great article! Keep'em coming!

Cheers,

NRG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ mr.bad eye</p>
<p>[chop]&#8230;<br />
i think the font size used is too small.<br />
it really makes it annoying to read a longer post.<br />
[/chop]&#8230;</p>
<p>If you are using a browser other than the now infamous Microsoft Internet Explorer versions 6 and under, you can simply hit &#8216;control&#8217; + &#8216;+&#8217; key. Conversely, font sizes can be shrunk using &#8216;control&#8217; + &#8216;-&#8217; keys. Just be warned that some browsers (like Firefox) will simply boost the font size but retain the other website structure&#8217;s size and integrity (which is what I personally prefer). Other browsers (like IE 7 or Opera for example) will scale everything (graphics included!).</p>
<p>@ Brian,</p>
<p>Great article. I really enjoyed it. Being paranoid, I simply keep images I shoot (and graphics I create) under complete copyright protection with all rights reserved. And as you mentioned, by posting images that are far less in resolution that their native maximum in-camera size, it makes &#8216;theft for large printing purposes&#8217; more limiting. As far as I am concerned, if you don&#8217;t want people making large prints out of images, don&#8217;t offer them access to full sized shots posted on the net.</p>
<p>I see many images posted in all their full resolution glory. This is simply an invitation to trouble IMHO. Being responsible on your end to help minimize potential damage is just as important as ensuring your work is properly protected from a legal standpoint.</p>
<p>Great article! Keep&#8217;em coming!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>NRG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-16591</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-16591</guid>
		<description>@Scott Caplan: While legal restitution is certainly an option using Creative Commons licenses, its not always the quickest and easiest path. Many times a community recognizes the value (and legal implications) of violating a Creative Commons license and their actions prompt the violator to do the right thing. There are too many examples to name of this, but I think Lessig describes one of the best ones here:

http://lessig.org/blog/2006/09/autoweek_on_come_on.html

and here: http://lessig.org/blog/2006/09/update_on_autoweek.html

F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott Caplan: While legal restitution is certainly an option using Creative Commons licenses, its not always the quickest and easiest path. Many times a community recognizes the value (and legal implications) of violating a Creative Commons license and their actions prompt the violator to do the right thing. There are too many examples to name of this, but I think Lessig describes one of the best ones here:</p>
<p><a href="http://lessig.org/blog/2006/09/autoweek_on_come_on.html" >http://lessig.org/blog/2006/09/autoweek_on_come_on.html</a></p>
<p>and here: <a href="http://lessig.org/blog/2006/09/update_on_autoweek.html" >http://lessig.org/blog/2006/09/update_on_autoweek.html</a></p>
<p>F</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Auer</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-16575</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Auer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/2007/11/14/creative-commons-a-great-concept-ill-continue-to-employ/#comment-16575</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.  As for the question, refer to Fred's comment above.  He's posted links to a couple of cases where a CC license has been involved with the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.  As for the question, refer to Fred&#8217;s comment above.  He&#8217;s posted links to a couple of cases where a CC license has been involved with the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.078 seconds -->
