<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SLR Camera: Then and Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/</link>
	<description>A Resource and Community for Photography Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Hancock</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-153796</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-153796</guid>
		<description>Brian,

After spending some time with my mentor (who ONLY shoots medium format film), I decided to expand my range and knowledge by purchasing a Mamiya RZ67.  It is the best purchase I have made regarding my photographic career.  While I still use my high end digital and (expensive) lenses I find the film process to be better, richer and more interesting.  It forces me to be a better photographer by focusing on the image and composition and EVERY detail in the viewfinder.

I started on 35mm film with a Pentax K1000 and made my way to 35mm digital but even exploring more elements of film (meaning the Medium Format) makes me a better photographer.  Actually, what did it for me was when I first composed an image by looking through the Mamiya Viewfinder and thinking to myself that this &quot;just makes sense.&quot;

Keep shooting film people... it makes you a better photographer.

Seth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>After spending some time with my mentor (who ONLY shoots medium format film), I decided to expand my range and knowledge by purchasing a Mamiya RZ67.  It is the best purchase I have made regarding my photographic career.  While I still use my high end digital and (expensive) lenses I find the film process to be better, richer and more interesting.  It forces me to be a better photographer by focusing on the image and composition and EVERY detail in the viewfinder.</p>
<p>I started on 35mm film with a Pentax K1000 and made my way to 35mm digital but even exploring more elements of film (meaning the Medium Format) makes me a better photographer.  Actually, what did it for me was when I first composed an image by looking through the Mamiya Viewfinder and thinking to myself that this &#8220;just makes sense.&#8221;</p>
<p>Keep shooting film people&#8230; it makes you a better photographer.</p>
<p>Seth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_wolf_brigade</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-141618</link>
		<dc:creator>the_wolf_brigade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-141618</guid>
		<description>@Jeyan:  It might be helpful to do a bit of research on how to develop your own black and white film too. You can do it without a darkroom and it will help keep the costs down for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeyan:  It might be helpful to do a bit of research on how to develop your own black and white film too. You can do it without a darkroom and it will help keep the costs down for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Auer</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-141614</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Auer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-141614</guid>
		<description>Actually, this is a great idea.  It&#039;s cheap to get into, and you won&#039;t be stuck with an expensive piece of equipment if you end up not liking it in the long run.  Plus, you&#039;ll probably learn the technical side of things a bit quicker with film (depending on what type of film slr you have).  Regardless of what you&#039;re shooting with, you&#039;re making photos... and that&#039;s the important thing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, this is a great idea.  It&#8217;s cheap to get into, and you won&#8217;t be stuck with an expensive piece of equipment if you end up not liking it in the long run.  Plus, you&#8217;ll probably learn the technical side of things a bit quicker with film (depending on what type of film slr you have).  Regardless of what you&#8217;re shooting with, you&#8217;re making photos&#8230; and that&#8217;s the important thing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeyan</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-141612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-141612</guid>
		<description>I am an photography enthusiast. but i don&#039;t have enough money to shell out for an dslr (I&#039;m only in grade 10) but i&#039;d really like to explore photography more in depth. so recently I&#039;ve started think of buying a cheap old fiml slr to learn with. is this a good idea? Any answers are deeply appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an photography enthusiast. but i don&#8217;t have enough money to shell out for an dslr (I&#8217;m only in grade 10) but i&#8217;d really like to explore photography more in depth. so recently I&#8217;ve started think of buying a cheap old fiml slr to learn with. is this a good idea? Any answers are deeply appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-115066</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-115066</guid>
		<description>I have both - a Canon AE-1 from 1977 and a Fujifilm S5 Pro. They&#039;re both lovely cameras, but I&#039;m certain that in 10 or 20 years I will have replaced the S5 and kept the AE-1. Simply because film SLRs peaked back then - all that has happened since has been the addition of features that make you work easier and faster. I too love the metering needle, I find it far more intuitive and use it just as you describe above. dSLRs are not by any means worse than film SLRs, but they have not reached a technical peak yet and so are doomed to be made obsolete. I don&#039;t mind - my only regret is that I can&#039;t use my beautiful 50mm and 35 - 105mm FD lenses on new Canons - if I could do that I would have stuck with Canon but as it was there was no downside to changing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both &#8211; a Canon AE-1 from 1977 and a Fujifilm S5 Pro. They&#8217;re both lovely cameras, but I&#8217;m certain that in 10 or 20 years I will have replaced the S5 and kept the AE-1. Simply because film SLRs peaked back then &#8211; all that has happened since has been the addition of features that make you work easier and faster. I too love the metering needle, I find it far more intuitive and use it just as you describe above. dSLRs are not by any means worse than film SLRs, but they have not reached a technical peak yet and so are doomed to be made obsolete. I don&#8217;t mind &#8211; my only regret is that I can&#8217;t use my beautiful 50mm and 35 &#8211; 105mm FD lenses on new Canons &#8211; if I could do that I would have stuck with Canon but as it was there was no downside to changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lighting</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-95048</link>
		<dc:creator>Lighting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-95048</guid>
		<description>It is amazing how things have changed. I used to carry film camera and bought first digital 5years ago. Upgraded to canon recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing how things have changed. I used to carry film camera and bought first digital 5years ago. Upgraded to canon recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things I Hate About Film</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-94131</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things I Hate About Film</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-94131</guid>
		<description>[...] you ever seen one of those old film cameras? They&#8217;re like metal bricks. Those things will probably be around after the cockroaches go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you ever seen one of those old film cameras? They&#8217;re like metal bricks. Those things will probably be around after the cockroaches go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san francisco photography</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-86905</link>
		<dc:creator>san francisco photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-86905</guid>
		<description>1 - we&#039;re all slaves to electricity. we&#039;re using computer for chrissakes.

2 - slowing down is great for some types of photography, awful for others. put your digital in manual exposure and manual focus modes if you want to slow down.

3 - i&#039;ll give you that one - the bigger viewfinders on film cameras are nice.

4 - you want a constant light meter, built into your camera? isn&#039;t that a convenience that makes you work faster? you should be using a handheld meter if you want to be consistent... otherwise, i&#039;d prefer to go with the half-depressed shutter, then an instant histogram to see if i blew a highlight. 

5 - there are aftermarket split-screen focusing screens available online for like $25.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; we&#8217;re all slaves to electricity. we&#8217;re using computer for chrissakes.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; slowing down is great for some types of photography, awful for others. put your digital in manual exposure and manual focus modes if you want to slow down.</p>
<p>3 &#8211; i&#8217;ll give you that one &#8211; the bigger viewfinders on film cameras are nice.</p>
<p>4 &#8211; you want a constant light meter, built into your camera? isn&#8217;t that a convenience that makes you work faster? you should be using a handheld meter if you want to be consistent&#8230; otherwise, i&#8217;d prefer to go with the half-depressed shutter, then an instant histogram to see if i blew a highlight. </p>
<p>5 &#8211; there are aftermarket split-screen focusing screens available online for like $25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things I Love About Film</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-86050</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things I Love About Film</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-86050</guid>
		<description>[...] OLD CAMERAS Have you ever seen one of those old film cameras? They&#8217;re like metal bricks. Those things will probably be around after the cockroaches go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OLD CAMERAS Have you ever seen one of those old film cameras? They&#8217;re like metal bricks. Those things will probably be around after the cockroaches go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvaro MAM</title>
		<link>http://blog.epicedits.com/2008/04/04/the-slr-camera-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-83943</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvaro MAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epicedits.com/?p=1879#comment-83943</guid>
		<description>Nice article, I did my little own take at the same issue some days ago:

http://alvaro.aycuens.com/post/40547704/creative-rut

Funny how we have &quot;focused&quot; on almost the same points and of course our digitals of today, will be really hard to operate in the future, if they survive of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, I did my little own take at the same issue some days ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://alvaro.aycuens.com/post/40547704/creative-rut" rel="nofollow">http://alvaro.aycuens.com/post/40547704/creative-rut</a></p>
<p>Funny how we have &#8220;focused&#8221; on almost the same points and of course our digitals of today, will be really hard to operate in the future, if they survive of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
